Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 10:03:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2EE3A611DCBF60D8932ED2E3BE5D6BB05B7C4521072C69DAA294B6EE2D633431
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes aren’t appropriate responses to the claim being made. If the study has methodological errors, which it probably does, those should be pointed out rather than arguments that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836648518477562262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2EE3A611DCBF60D8932ED2E3BE5D6BB05B7C4521072C69DAA294B6EE2D633431
  • createdAtMillis - 1726740194565
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18366485184775622622EE3A611DCBF60D8932ED2E3BE5D6BB05B7C4521072C69DAA294B6EE2D633431