Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 18:44:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes aren’t appropriate responses to the claim being made. If the study has methodological errors, which it probably does, those should be pointed out rather than arguments that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836648518477562262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1726771446645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18366485184775622621C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4