Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 18:03:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02CE8165F1D379E58B5D34CAA6DFCD1EC9BBF20A0B5EE56D08E1DFCD465635F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes aren’t appropriate responses to the claim being made. If the study has methodological errors, which it probably does, those should be pointed out rather than arguments that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836648518477562262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02CE8165F1D379E58B5D34CAA6DFCD1EC9BBF20A0B5EE56D08E1DFCD465635F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1726769030234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183664851847756226202CE8165F1D379E58B5D34CAA6DFCD1EC9BBF20A0B5EE56D08E1DFCD465635F6