Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 04:26:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 229EA22C4FFA216872C27AB7838FDBD52007750E01DE3BEC65111ED6868A4145
Participant Details

Original Note:

全て訂正することは文字数の都合で不可能ですが事実に反する記述が多数見られます ・放射能(そのまま受け取ると意味不明だが,放射線量と区別できず誤解している?) 空間線量は各国主要都市並 https://www.clair.or.kr/etc/radiation_info.asp 健康への悪影響が見られないが日本以上の自然放射線の地域もある https://www.env.go.jp/chemi/rhm/r4kisoshiryo/r4kiso-02-05-05.html ・添加物,農薬,自殺率,精神科:デマ,根拠なし https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/health/japan-vs-us-food-additive-approvals/ https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/lifestyle/inaccuracies-in-government-criticism-such-as-japan-being-the-top-user-of-pesticides-image/ 出典も根拠も不明の画像を鵜呑みにしないようにしましょう

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836607512164077616
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 229EA22C4FFA216872C27AB7838FDBD52007750E01DE3BEC65111ED6868A4145
  • createdAtMillis - 1726719998979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1836607512164077616229EA22C4FFA216872C27AB7838FDBD52007750E01DE3BEC65111ED6868A4145