Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 01:32:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1F83CB7984F18994341C0217B267271005D51AEC6035990EEAC158DCC4453A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Historians generally consider Leo Frank to have been wrongfully convicted. The fact that the pardon isn't the same as legally finding him innocent isn't relevant context, since the post never makes that claim. https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/leo-frank-lynching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824915724529217900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1F83CB7984F18994341C0217B267271005D51AEC6035990EEAC158DCC4453A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723944723827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824915724529217900A1F83CB7984F18994341C0217B267271005D51AEC6035990EEAC158DCC4453A1