Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 00:24:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0CFF577B643E3BCF2380F072363B2509D5998FC0130854BBA9CE52A39F6846E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Historians generally consider Leo Frank to have been wrongfully convicted. The fact that the pardon isn't the same as legally finding him innocent isn't relevant context, since the post never makes that claim. https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/leo-frank-lynching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824915724529217900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0CFF577B643E3BCF2380F072363B2509D5998FC0130854BBA9CE52A39F6846E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723940656177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824915724529217900A0CFF577B643E3BCF2380F072363B2509D5998FC0130854BBA9CE52A39F6846E