Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 10:09:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2889629B6B1FFDAA31986C22668B1D83890EF182E1475078A06A649CF9A8834A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Historians generally consider Leo Frank to have been wrongfully convicted. The fact that the pardon isn't the same as legally finding him innocent isn't relevant context, since the post never makes that claim. https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/leo-frank-lynching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824915724529217900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2889629B6B1FFDAA31986C22668B1D83890EF182E1475078A06A649CF9A8834A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723975788037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18249157245292179002889629B6B1FFDAA31986C22668B1D83890EF182E1475078A06A649CF9A8834A