Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 12:33:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 118925BCA18587734689FE2EB53B6C79F9E88BBAFE0D52AB78EFC5789E8F4493
Participant Details

Original Note:

Historians generally consider Leo Frank to have been wrongfully convicted. The fact that the pardon isn't the same as legally finding him innocent isn't relevant context, since the post never makes that claim. https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/leo-frank-lynching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824915724529217900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 118925BCA18587734689FE2EB53B6C79F9E88BBAFE0D52AB78EFC5789E8F4493
  • createdAtMillis - 1723984429412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824915724529217900118925BCA18587734689FE2EB53B6C79F9E88BBAFE0D52AB78EFC5789E8F4493