Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 13:03:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9940A6057296C2F7BE4FAC44BF385FF88D94F4CE5B83F476AEEAA0C1C4BFF0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

No need for CN’s. Post is completely factual and it’s made clear the split between salary and expenses. Previous CN post uses the CN platform to undermine this particular poster, which is contrary to the point of and an abuse of Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824844288573788160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9940A6057296C2F7BE4FAC44BF385FF88D94F4CE5B83F476AEEAA0C1C4BFF0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723986212788
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824844288573788160B9940A6057296C2F7BE4FAC44BF385FF88D94F4CE5B83F476AEEAA0C1C4BFF0F