Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 18:01:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2A2E209F504EB672CC99F2E7CE5896B99D0F24C8AC14D0B3712553264C8A42C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No need for CN’s. Post is completely factual and it’s made clear the split between salary and expenses. Previous CN post uses the CN platform to undermine this particular poster, which is contrary to the point of and an abuse of Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824844288573788160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2A2E209F504EB672CC99F2E7CE5896B99D0F24C8AC14D0B3712553264C8A42C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723917698701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824844288573788160A2A2E209F504EB672CC99F2E7CE5896B99D0F24C8AC14D0B3712553264C8A42C