Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 06:50:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F1F4B12C61E3B9B65CBE523A5E85F7D0CD80B8436C387913914C667BEAC4D10
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is impossible to prove a negative assertion like this without omniscience. https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialSciences/ppecorino/PHIL_of_RELIGION_TEXT/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824545103232504249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F1F4B12C61E3B9B65CBE523A5E85F7D0CD80B8436C387913914C667BEAC4D10
  • createdAtMillis - 1723877423588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18245451032325042495F1F4B12C61E3B9B65CBE523A5E85F7D0CD80B8436C387913914C667BEAC4D10