Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 20:44:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97E01FC0F64AD7E32D24D104A9F33F8E3C176D8D8851245563616AC6DB9F8744
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note n'a aucun sens. Si on prend la même logique, dire que c'est de la diffamation alors qu'il n'a pas été condamné pour diffamation est de la diffamation. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006165410/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824507547719496045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97E01FC0F64AD7E32D24D104A9F33F8E3C176D8D8851245563616AC6DB9F8744
  • createdAtMillis - 1723841058536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182450754771949604597E01FC0F64AD7E32D24D104A9F33F8E3C176D8D8851245563616AC6DB9F8744