Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 12:51:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21A1E500CEB296FBB03206793ABB91A8240F37AF35DB183223AA3B4B318BB684
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note n'a aucun sens. Si on prend la même logique, dire que c'est de la diffamation alors qu'il n'a pas été condamné pour diffamation est de la diffamation. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006165410/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824507547719496045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21A1E500CEB296FBB03206793ABB91A8240F37AF35DB183223AA3B4B318BB684
  • createdAtMillis - 1723899063625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182450754771949604521A1E500CEB296FBB03206793ABB91A8240F37AF35DB183223AA3B4B318BB684