Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 20:24:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3458265405FB535EC743D1579CFAB2F854BA1C36580CE2B1950F2CE7784C601
Participant Details

Original Note:

Research underscores that fact-checkers’ personal biases influence both their choice of which statements to analyze and their determination of accuracy. - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-fact-checking1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824504285859594366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3458265405FB535EC743D1579CFAB2F854BA1C36580CE2B1950F2CE7784C601
  • createdAtMillis - 1723839883969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824504285859594366C3458265405FB535EC743D1579CFAB2F854BA1C36580CE2B1950F2CE7784C601