Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 17:44:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not state that any specific named individual is guilty of an offence and there is therefore no contempt of court. www.gov.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824501462942011784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723916699402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824501462942011784F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D