Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-21 14:32:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F1BCFDE50BFD5FB64761F917C66A4BF92B34F3A55F2A2161E8275C2FBF42E22
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not state that any specific named individual is guilty of an offence and there is therefore no contempt of court. www.gov.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824501462942011784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F1BCFDE50BFD5FB64761F917C66A4BF92B34F3A55F2A2161E8275C2FBF42E22
  • createdAtMillis - 1724250751025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18245014629420117849F1BCFDE50BFD5FB64761F917C66A4BF92B34F3A55F2A2161E8275C2FBF42E22