Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 22:31:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E059E99B447B98198969B97AA94165CF2ED65E4C26C04335D02208C968BBC91
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not state that any specific named individual is guilty of an offence and there is therefore no contempt of court. www.gov.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824501462942011784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E059E99B447B98198969B97AA94165CF2ED65E4C26C04335D02208C968BBC91
  • createdAtMillis - 1723933904509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18245014629420117848E059E99B447B98198969B97AA94165CF2ED65E4C26C04335D02208C968BBC91