Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 05:37:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D4F074B846F43571F2D8A4494138F6D236999BC86E9CE9C581CFB36B7D8D604
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not state that any specific named individual is guilty of an offence and there is therefore no contempt of court. www.gov.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824501462942011784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D4F074B846F43571F2D8A4494138F6D236999BC86E9CE9C581CFB36B7D8D604
  • createdAtMillis - 1723873031786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18245014629420117844D4F074B846F43571F2D8A4494138F6D236999BC86E9CE9C581CFB36B7D8D604