Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-18 20:30:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0AEA6D6B6C2D5DBBFB562173C42F47F7A579844FF146AE1A1E16FDE1057B5AC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post does not state that any specific named individual is guilty of an offence and there is therefore no contempt of court. www.gov.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824501462942011784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0AEA6D6B6C2D5DBBFB562173C42F47F7A579844FF146AE1A1E16FDE1057B5AC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1724013018515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18245014629420117840AEA6D6B6C2D5DBBFB562173C42F47F7A579844FF146AE1A1E16FDE1057B5AC9