Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 14:53:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98577DC0AC911FFF70CE748FB5FEED1164059E20F408D4BD65AD31325C0470AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that this is not protected speech is incorrect. Per Brandenburg v Ohio, incitement must both advocate *imminent* violence, and be likely to have that result, in order to be unlawful. Neither criterion is met here. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824309638130770004
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98577DC0AC911FFF70CE748FB5FEED1164059E20F408D4BD65AD31325C0470AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723819992024
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182430963813077000498577DC0AC911FFF70CE748FB5FEED1164059E20F408D4BD65AD31325C0470AA