Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 06:29:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D6CBE2CBF9678F77F222745D4F6A6381B3564D46CEC4661C2BCEC7A2826A2DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note links to an NIH article that is not about the boxer in question and does not even name here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824180375259893797
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D6CBE2CBF9678F77F222745D4F6A6381B3564D46CEC4661C2BCEC7A2826A2DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1723876188664
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18241803752598937979D6CBE2CBF9678F77F222745D4F6A6381B3564D46CEC4661C2BCEC7A2826A2DE