Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 12:49:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48BC45E5B9E2500705088BDFE1DB90189710948B8055BD6686F445DD3613B393
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note links to an NIH article that is not about the boxer in question and does not even name here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824180375259893797
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48BC45E5B9E2500705088BDFE1DB90189710948B8055BD6686F445DD3613B393
  • createdAtMillis - 1723812597209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182418037525989379748BC45E5B9E2500705088BDFE1DB90189710948B8055BD6686F445DD3613B393