Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 08:16:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7EB030140D06FA90565DF130E6FA9651E891FBECFB6B1A5F14C57DF072CE76F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The « article » of the Lancet is actually a letter, iow an opinion and not a peered-reviewed study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824071470609473850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7EB030140D06FA90565DF130E6FA9651E891FBECFB6B1A5F14C57DF072CE76F
  • createdAtMillis - 1723796217825
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824071470609473850D7EB030140D06FA90565DF130E6FA9651E891FBECFB6B1A5F14C57DF072CE76F