Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 14:22:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F7B4E82DC1A498734D76B3DCD05935F365CFA909C59B3425F81D534E34F36AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The « article » of the Lancet is actually a letter, iow an opinion and not a peered-reviewed study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824071470609473850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F7B4E82DC1A498734D76B3DCD05935F365CFA909C59B3425F81D534E34F36AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1723904522814
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18240714706094738507F7B4E82DC1A498734D76B3DCD05935F365CFA909C59B3425F81D534E34F36AD