Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 19:21:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The « article » of the Lancet is actually a letter, iow an opinion and not a peered-reviewed study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824071470609473850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1723749705954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1824071470609473850660E856FAC8FC09C0A8F8EB9EF10AFE6075CE5138CFB20C0C8AF4F9EA7AA02A8