Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 22:17:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1541B60ADDB4878DB151B575ACEEFBF2893F117A99F98D699453653D73A98050
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The « article » of the Lancet is actually a letter, iow an opinion and not a peered-reviewed study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824071470609473850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1541B60ADDB4878DB151B575ACEEFBF2893F117A99F98D699453653D73A98050
  • createdAtMillis - 1723846658338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18240714706094738501541B60ADDB4878DB151B575ACEEFBF2893F117A99F98D699453653D73A98050