Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-16 23:12:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8222BC6A29E8EEE9F01B7291EE68827C356407677C552B6D99237750DC352220
Participant Details

Original Note:

判決 https://t.co/7viLobHN8J は 「新型コロナワクチンは病気の予防や感染の拡散阻止に効果がないため、ワクチンとは認められない」 との裁定ではなく、 原告の反ワクチンの主張がどれほど馬鹿げていても再審請求は認めざるを得ない とするものです we must accept the plaintiffs’ alleged facts as true, whether “actual proof” of them is “improbable” 「原告の主張を真実として受けいれねばならない、たとえ「実際の証明」が「あり得ないようなもの」だとしても

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824068207029948891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8222BC6A29E8EEE9F01B7291EE68827C356407677C552B6D99237750DC352220
  • createdAtMillis - 1723849934180
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18240682070299488918222BC6A29E8EEE9F01B7291EE68827C356407677C552B6D99237750DC352220