Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 18:13:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
Participant Details

Original Note:

マスクに効果がないとの主張は、2024年の複数の研究に反しており、根拠も薄弱です。 公共の場での着用は感染を約2.5-3割程度防ぎます。 https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/cmr.00124-23 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078918 また、N95 は98%、布マスクが87%、サージカルマスクは74%、KN95は71%、呼気のウイルスを阻止します。 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964%2824%2900192-0/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1824033305320366146
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
  • createdAtMillis - 1723745625436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18240333053203661466D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005