Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 04:14:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4C31C1FDC6A081AC7763B720B3BCBDA6DB9DBFECCC0E2FAB92F9F5AE18D3B0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

1) The explanations provided, explaining errors would not change machine counts, are not provable. 2) I was there. I was one of the voters who was witness to the machine printing the wrong answers on the paper ballots. In a recount, using paper ballots, the answers switch back?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823868323596996794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4C31C1FDC6A081AC7763B720B3BCBDA6DB9DBFECCC0E2FAB92F9F5AE18D3B0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723695255216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823868323596996794C4C31C1FDC6A081AC7763B720B3BCBDA6DB9DBFECCC0E2FAB92F9F5AE18D3B0E