Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 18:28:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 271D14016F6E8712D56CA0DD9877C3FB2AD4CEE234F2712CBAD3E3E9EE5E9E34
Participant Details

Original Note:

1) The explanations provided, explaining errors would not change machine counts, are not provable. 2) I was there. I was one of the voters who was witness to the machine printing the wrong answers on the paper ballots. In a recount, using paper ballots, the answers switch back?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823868323596996794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 271D14016F6E8712D56CA0DD9877C3FB2AD4CEE234F2712CBAD3E3E9EE5E9E34
  • createdAtMillis - 1723746513889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823868323596996794271D14016F6E8712D56CA0DD9877C3FB2AD4CEE234F2712CBAD3E3E9EE5E9E34