Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 07:27:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FA6E2BDA6EDFE01B6AF057C817C804CB9075B5ABD55D1152A4A88CAA8E8398E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims that Raygun's husband was involved in the selection process or was a judge at the qualifiers has been debunked. The other claims do not have enough evidence to be proven true or false at this time. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/no-rayguns-olympic-selection-not-an-inside-job/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823778665978818915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FA6E2BDA6EDFE01B6AF057C817C804CB9075B5ABD55D1152A4A88CAA8E8398E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723706860309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18237786659788189152FA6E2BDA6EDFE01B6AF057C817C804CB9075B5ABD55D1152A4A88CAA8E8398E