Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 11:50:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C16F815B5D697AAD5F38EB9A475E40B9CDDC07A944D85691E5D95222AC9C255
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. At least the first proposed note isn't needed. I agree, it was hilarious, but that's a subjective call. One could make a case that this was not a far left (or even left wing in any way) protest, but that's not what the note says.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823728353867628807
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C16F815B5D697AAD5F38EB9A475E40B9CDDC07A944D85691E5D95222AC9C255
  • createdAtMillis - 1723722607234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18237283538676288074C16F815B5D697AAD5F38EB9A475E40B9CDDC07A944D85691E5D95222AC9C255