Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 22:21:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F40F20002D85210BF228868E430E8E0AB967A6C6B9531D425DD2020EC7DF9EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. At least the first proposed note isn't needed. I agree, it was hilarious, but that's a subjective call. One could make a case that this was not a far left (or even left wing in any way) protest, but that's not what the note says.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823728353867628807
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F40F20002D85210BF228868E430E8E0AB967A6C6B9531D425DD2020EC7DF9EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1723760504096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18237283538676288073F40F20002D85210BF228868E430E8E0AB967A6C6B9531D425DD2020EC7DF9EC