Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 14:20:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C754642DC660C272DFFDF1E26855104D2F03B2CCE22A9BF86FA289B29000F97C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note criticises the OP on factual grounds. However, (1) linked source only partially supports the note (2) notes are for provably false claims, not for flagging politically contentious claims. There is plenty of evidence supporting the OP's factual claim, e.g. : https://www.ft.com/content/e4a95eac-71bc-4da9-b029-200764179d0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823724029590548696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C754642DC660C272DFFDF1E26855104D2F03B2CCE22A9BF86FA289B29000F97C
  • createdAtMillis - 1723645203409
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823724029590548696C754642DC660C272DFFDF1E26855104D2F03B2CCE22A9BF86FA289B29000F97C