Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 09:45:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6260AFA8C4C0A9FDEB337B0586D584191304986A427402D89B11C70ED2D40829
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note criticises the OP on factual grounds. However, (1) linked source only partially supports the note (2) notes are for provably false claims, not for flagging politically contentious claims. There is plenty of evidence supporting the OP's factual claim, e.g. : https://www.ft.com/content/e4a95eac-71bc-4da9-b029-200764179d0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823724029590548696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6260AFA8C4C0A9FDEB337B0586D584191304986A427402D89B11C70ED2D40829
  • createdAtMillis - 1723715102363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18237240295905486966260AFA8C4C0A9FDEB337B0586D584191304986A427402D89B11C70ED2D40829