Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 12:24:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16ED93AFFE1FE568535A904411524B7627CF55495902BDCF1A6409B5F02C8F87
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note criticises the OP on factual grounds. However, (1) linked source only partially supports the note (2) notes are for provably false claims, not for flagging politically contentious claims. There is plenty of evidence supporting the OP's factual claim, e.g. : https://www.ft.com/content/e4a95eac-71bc-4da9-b029-200764179d0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823724029590548696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16ED93AFFE1FE568535A904411524B7627CF55495902BDCF1A6409B5F02C8F87
  • createdAtMillis - 1723724697010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182372402959054869616ED93AFFE1FE568535A904411524B7627CF55495902BDCF1A6409B5F02C8F87