Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 22:16:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 226FB30CE29429F7F4C543EF5EF470F2016D52E8EAF43F9CE746542AD2F471EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

件の事件は、裁判がまだ始まっていない裁判員裁判で審議される案件のため、一部の情報だけで判断することなく、結論を導くことがないように注意することが必要です。 https://www.gov-online.go.jp/useful/article/202011/1.html#firsrSection

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823523583269986391
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 226FB30CE29429F7F4C543EF5EF470F2016D52E8EAF43F9CE746542AD2F471EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1723673808393
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1823523583269986391226FB30CE29429F7F4C543EF5EF470F2016D52E8EAF43F9CE746542AD2F471EB