Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 01:01:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE9FDC2EAB59D0DBB83B0D0A74D81771F06EE86261F62FF25E71ECB00BF52370
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は 「記事内に他社の名前を使うという事は、本来なら原稿の確認を依頼しなければならない程の行為である」 という主張です よって 「共著の意味を取り違えている」 という指摘には当たりません

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823519787596833153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE9FDC2EAB59D0DBB83B0D0A74D81771F06EE86261F62FF25E71ECB00BF52370
  • createdAtMillis - 1723597260405
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823519787596833153CE9FDC2EAB59D0DBB83B0D0A74D81771F06EE86261F62FF25E71ECB00BF52370