Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 02:22:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71F2D269C94EF34E1049E3A9F6D83099910BCCF00864A2CDA2F1EC5754DC96BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は 「記事内に他社の名前を使うという事は、本来なら原稿の確認を依頼しなければならない程の行為である」 という主張です よって 「共著の意味を取り違えている」 という指摘には当たりません

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823519787596833153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71F2D269C94EF34E1049E3A9F6D83099910BCCF00864A2CDA2F1EC5754DC96BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1723602146556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182351978759683315371F2D269C94EF34E1049E3A9F6D83099910BCCF00864A2CDA2F1EC5754DC96BF