Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 00:41:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 246C95C33AB09AB1CED4C51FB26E3583110A20FB362E6B4FCA38D6D1D2DF377D
Participant Details

Original Note:

『共著』を一般的な用法と大きく異なる意味で使っている事に留意が必要です。 https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E5%85%B1%E8%91%97#google_vignette 一般に、共著者に対しては通常は原稿確認を依頼しますが、取材対象者に対しては原稿確認を依頼するかは、取材内容によってケースバイケースです。 https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/opinion/15/221102/022700176/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823515580412125616
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 246C95C33AB09AB1CED4C51FB26E3583110A20FB362E6B4FCA38D6D1D2DF377D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723596072379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1823515580412125616246C95C33AB09AB1CED4C51FB26E3583110A20FB362E6B4FCA38D6D1D2DF377D