Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 06:35:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While I agree this is a strange headline, it is not misleading as it doesn’t make a contrary implication that would require further context to be understood and is not misleading. You can add the missing information in the replies. The CN above is also clearly abusive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823508323347652681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1723617351238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18235083233476526819E86A4E18FDB5C79C1A1C654360A812423DBBF38FD9E43289051D8D536A857B6