Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 08:38:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 834B055A9DF34F8EB200818D292C05A34A6F107601CF5291E3459FB69DAC1F3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While I agree this is a strange headline, it is not misleading as it doesn’t make a contrary implication that would require further context to be understood and is not misleading. You can add the missing information in the replies. The CN above is also clearly abusive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823508323347652681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 834B055A9DF34F8EB200818D292C05A34A6F107601CF5291E3459FB69DAC1F3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723624735618
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823508323347652681834B055A9DF34F8EB200818D292C05A34A6F107601CF5291E3459FB69DAC1F3A