Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 07:38:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 664F1DFFA2F7D997667F2B1AF94AA825F00C2D562F9B962FEF3ECEB4997DF215
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While I agree this is a strange headline, it is not misleading as it doesn’t make a contrary implication that would require further context to be understood and is not misleading. You can add the missing information in the replies. The CN above is also clearly abusive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823508323347652681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 664F1DFFA2F7D997667F2B1AF94AA825F00C2D562F9B962FEF3ECEB4997DF215
  • createdAtMillis - 1723621109432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823508323347652681664F1DFFA2F7D997667F2B1AF94AA825F00C2D562F9B962FEF3ECEB4997DF215