Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 11:15:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EF41E9E2F544C9234231F56A996F0E07E3DD97A76AAC41D15EF2FA8588FB1EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While I agree this is a strange headline, it is not misleading as it doesn’t make a contrary implication that would require further context to be understood and is not misleading. You can add the missing information in the replies. The CN above is also clearly abusive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823508323347652681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EF41E9E2F544C9234231F56A996F0E07E3DD97A76AAC41D15EF2FA8588FB1EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1723634108680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18235083233476526814EF41E9E2F544C9234231F56A996F0E07E3DD97A76AAC41D15EF2FA8588FB1EF