Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 12:34:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 351BD9D9DE54B47692480673BD6325A83DA87D6F321221C46FCA11999F4A4A90
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While I agree this is a strange headline, it is not misleading as it doesn’t make a contrary implication that would require further context to be understood and is not misleading. You can add the missing information in the replies. The CN above is also clearly abusive.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823508323347652681
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 351BD9D9DE54B47692480673BD6325A83DA87D6F321221C46FCA11999F4A4A90
  • createdAtMillis - 1723638864517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823508323347652681351BD9D9DE54B47692480673BD6325A83DA87D6F321221C46FCA11999F4A4A90