Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 09:33:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 377996ED4F475124FBD99309A5482D4C4B9C026537B6AF7B334AC0BADA1D669A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Imagine linking to the DAILY MAIL and then still confidently clicking on the 'I linked sources I believe most people would consider trustworthy' check. All of their articles from the last month I've seen were both against my will and unverified BS. Barely journalists

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823428063478341924
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 377996ED4F475124FBD99309A5482D4C4B9C026537B6AF7B334AC0BADA1D669A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723628029860
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1823428063478341924377996ED4F475124FBD99309A5482D4C4B9C026537B6AF7B334AC0BADA1D669A