Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 20:08:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 378F5E4F76657465C180E25464BCE6DE33BE14263BEBE0606FDFEFBBBC03A124
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While partially true, there are questions concerning the barcode in the past. An unreadable barcode presented to the voter without a way to confirm its contents should be enough to enter some doubt. https://georgiarecorder.com/briefs/suit-backed-by-georgia-lawmaker-challenges-states-ballot-barcode-system/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823423707194515697
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 378F5E4F76657465C180E25464BCE6DE33BE14263BEBE0606FDFEFBBBC03A124
  • createdAtMillis - 1723579690761
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1823423707194515697378F5E4F76657465C180E25464BCE6DE33BE14263BEBE0606FDFEFBBBC03A124