Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 16:21:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46C3986A8A527DE73237740E2236F1A6BAC1CD45D9DB98EEACE02689F7EBF7BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Shepherd case has come under heavy scrutiny since the event. The original explanation has been questioned. Walz’s rapid response based on preliminary information can raise questions about his character such as patience, inquisitiveness, and judgment. https://is.gd/ufpj9h

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823337293744132179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46C3986A8A527DE73237740E2236F1A6BAC1CD45D9DB98EEACE02689F7EBF7BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1723566085687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 182333729374413217946C3986A8A527DE73237740E2236F1A6BAC1CD45D9DB98EEACE02689F7EBF7BD