Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 23:44:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32A2370BF29492AFD3A0EF30D0A30A284C68A7941C3DA6D850874A4529E2837E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Shepherd case has come under heavy scrutiny since the event. The original explanation has been questioned. Walz’s rapid response based on preliminary information can raise questions about his character such as patience, inquisitiveness, and judgment. https://is.gd/ufpj9h

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823337293744132179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32A2370BF29492AFD3A0EF30D0A30A284C68A7941C3DA6D850874A4529E2837E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723679066502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182333729374413217932A2370BF29492AFD3A0EF30D0A30A284C68A7941C3DA6D850874A4529E2837E