Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 12:19:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5718157D4D500A17218A8B9691992EC18113FD8DEA3A029C77549169264FAAE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note's source has some good information but itself presents many unverified claims as fact. I'm unconvinced that a note using unverified claims to counter unverified claims is appropriate, even if parts of it are correct. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/13/politics/fact-check-trump-musk-20-false-claims/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823313097748308055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5718157D4D500A17218A8B9691992EC18113FD8DEA3A029C77549169264FAAE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1723551589207
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18233130977483080555718157D4D500A17218A8B9691992EC18113FD8DEA3A029C77549169264FAAE3